Why People may support Euthanasia

While many people vehemently oppose the case of Euthanasia, there is an equally strong force to back it up. Euthanasia, also called mercy killing, is the practice of sparing the patients of pains and sufferings from his or her terminal diseases, using lethal dose of medicines. The question of whether this should be legalized or not has been in debate for decades.

Reasons to support Euthanasia

People who back up Euthanasia and push for it to be legalized argue that this procedure is more kind to people who suffer. Supporters of this cause believe that if there is no way to cure the person of his sickness, then death is unavoidable. In this case, a doctor or a medical professional should be allowed to help end his life and stop all the pains completely. If a person is suffering from physical pains then it is more humane to free him of his unnecessary suffering. This belief is backed up by the constitutional right of privacy and supporters of this method also put individuality ahead of social norms.

Wolhandler’s Opinion:

Wolhandler, one of the most famous supporters of the mercy killing process, proposed that euthanasia is supported by constitutional right of privacy. A person is free from the state’s judgment if he or she voluntarily chooses euthanasia or suicide with external help.

Accommodating religious beliefs

Accommodating religious beliefsThe support for euthanasia is also rooted from the wish to accommodate different beliefs. The Supreme Court also seems to support the case of passive euthanasia. This presents a foundation for the second reason for euthanasia. The argument proposes that there is no need to make a clear cut line between active and passive practice of euthanasia. There is no distinction and it is impossible to try and tell them apart. Therefore, if passive euthanasia should be legalized then so is active one.

Another argument said that the court decision regarding state interest will also make both forms of euthanasia a legalized matter and thus, the distinction is no longer relevant.

Overall, the debate over euthanasia is still going on. Both the supporters and critics of this method have their own arguments and both sides strongly back up their beliefs. This remains a sensitive debate, as the life or death of people are being brought into question. Once this debate comes to an end, it will set a precedent to thousands, even millions of cases later, which affect the lives of thousands, or millions of people.

Do you agree or disagree  read more about Health Care Guide for Adults

Why some people are against Euthanasia

Although euthanasia is accepted by many as a remedy against painful sufferings, many people are still strongly against the method. To many people, euthanasia will destroy the very fundamental foundation of social rules and damage the values that build up the society that we are living in. With the practice of euthanasia, we will grow to be numb and senseless to the matter of life and death. Accepting the method, is what people think will get rid of all the manners and beliefs that society has put into us. The action itself is seen by critics as disrespectful to the value of life. The circle of life as intended is no longer followed and overall the society will suffer from a disastrous change. All bad things will start and increase as there is no longer a clear line between right and wrong.

Never Ending Debate

Never Ending Debate

Over the years, technology has brought changes into every corner of our lives. From spending hours on hand chopping and prepping food, we can now process ingredients with just a press of a button with the best blenders for smoothies. There were debates of old-fashioned kitchen work versus the convenience of modern society, but we grew to accept a compromise with the mix of traditions and modernity in our kitchen. The debate of Euthanasia, on the other hand, just keeps growing, even with medical technology at a level of accurately diagnose most human diseases.

Reasons to oppose Euthanasia

oppose EuthanasiaPeople who are against euthanasia argue that if this method becomes a legal practice, there will be potential abuse of the method. Doctors or whoever is granted with this power can simply let it get to their heads and start misusing the process. This is called the “wedge theory”.

Yale Kamisar, a law professor at University of Michigan, is one of the most well-known critics of euthanasia. He proposed three reasons to oppose this concept, which are the risk of mistake, the risk of abuse, and the wedge theory.

The Wedge Theory

The wedge theory proposes that as soon as society decides that a life can be ended because its quality decreased, there will be a great abuse of the concept. There is no way to put a limitation on it. When euthanasia becomes legal, it will be extremely difficult to distinguish between voluntary and involuntary cases. There will be very hard to tell good doings from illegal ones and with bad intentions. Who will be there to decide how much the patient has to suffer before the act is done.

The theory goes on to say that in the case of Nazism, euthanasia had become entirely merciless. The method was used to get rid of people who are deemed not desirable by others. The bottom line is that, no person should have the power of deciding to end a life. The wedge theory say that we are all human living among each other, and everyone should have the same equality. Thus, the concept of “mercy killing”, which gives a person power to decide someone else’s life or death, is against the natural balance of society. History shows that the Nazis have disguised their horrible act with the term

What is the Palliative Cure?

cure-palliative1Palliative Cure, by definition, is a medical treatment that focuses on alleviating symptoms of diseases or suppressing these symptoms only. This treatment does not stop the growth of sickness or reverse it. Palliative Cure is usually used when there is no cure, and thus just tries to keep people from suffering severe pain or discomfort to help them through the rest of their time. It does not get rid of the disease or sickness completely.

It is also worth noting that this type of treatment doesn’t always depend on prognosis. Prognosis is usually given along with this treatment and other types of medicines that the patient requires. One shouldn’t confuse Palliative Cure with hospice care either. Hospice care give treatments to those who are almost at the end of their life. Palliative cure, on the other hand can be used for terminally ill patients in whichever phase of sickness.

Palliative Cure is usually used to indicate any form of treatment that alleviate the symptoms. A recent issue from WHO stated that palliative form of treatment is one that only help the life quality of the patients who are suffering from fatal illness. It can also be used to suppress symptoms that are side effect of the curative treatments. For example, a cancer patient who receives chemotherapy may suffer from nausea. Palliative cure can be given to treat or lessen the nausea.

This treatment nowadays is often used in case of diseases besides cancer, such as fatal heart diseases. It is also used in reference to a variety of neurological conditions. More and more applications of palliative cure prove that the need is growing. This is especially true for children who suffer from serious illness. Initially, treatments of sort are seen with skeptical eyes, with claims that it cause addiction and undesired side effects.

Doctors and medical professionals now start to embrace this type of treatment on a worldwide scale. 55% of hospitals in the United States offer Palliative Cure. The treatment is also offered at about one fifth of community hospitals. This is actually good news for patients.

Palliative Cure has a simple goal of relieving patients of unnecessary suffering and helping them make the best of their last days. Even though it doesn’t treat the sickness completely, many people believe that it is the right thing to do, providing necessary help to children and adults in need.

Health Care Guide for Adults

After becoming grown-ups, most people don’t have annual checkups or even consult a doctor when they are sick. Only when our health issues become unbearable do we bring our miserable selves to see a doctor. Some of us don’t even have a medical professional that we often visit, and just leave ourselves in hands of emergency rooms when bad things happen. The thing is, we each have only one body and if this one is gone, there is going to be no replacement available.

Health Care adult us

Modern lives often demand that we follow a tight, crazy schedule and there is less time to take care of our own bodies. Therefore, there is no question that our bodies are no longer on tip-top shape. We each experience headaches, heartburn, back pains, and fatigue, but we ignore them or rely on pain killer to help us through the day. Of course it seems right, nobody is picking up our kids, paying our bills, or making our dinners if we lay down to rest. However, if we don’t prioritize our health and ignore what the body is trying to warn us, then it might be already too late.

The first thing to do, is to find a regular physician whom you can trust. This person should know the honest state of your health. Even a good doctor may not be able to treat you properly if he doesn’t know the full medical history or the true symptom that you are experiencing.

If you don’t have an idea of where to find a good doctor, your insurance company can give recommendation. Most companies have a list of local physicians or you can receive a guidebook with all the information in the mail. These are the ones that work with your insurance company and you can at least rest assured that your medical bills will be covered at least partially.

The next step to do is to contact the physicians on the list and see if they can take on more patients. Believe it or not, some doctors are so popular that they will not be able to properly provide care to more patients. You can then make an appointment to meet the physicians before making the decision. If you feel rushed through the meeting, it is probably not a good match.

Once you found a physician, schedule a general checkup. This way you and your doctor will know for sure if there is any problem. Even if there is nothing to worry about, it will help the doctor to have medical records of you on hand should anything happen. With proper knowledge, the doctor can always narrow down the cause of sickness much quicker and give you treatment more effectively.

Related Articles:

Euthanasia – The ethical controversy

Euthanasia and Suicidal Facilitating Organization

Euthanasia and Suicidal Facilitating Organization

Euthanasia is seen as the last thing to do if a person is diagnosed with a terminal, incurable disease. There is no choice left but to end his life with mercy, usually involved using medicines that put him to eternal sleep. This allows all the pain to stop at once.

Euthanasia Organization ptIn our evolving world, there is a debate going on every time a new thing is introduced. As simple as a pressure cooker for example, where at first, people believe that an traditional one will better than the electric cooker. Then the best electric pressure cooker is introduced with many advanced features, enhanced safety, and better cooking function, and put the debate to rest.

The debate of euthanasia is not so simple, however. A strong supporter of Euthanasia is Ludwig Minelli, the founder of Dignitas, an organization that help people commit suicide. Minelli claimed that the critic of euthanasia is full with terrible pretense that is cruel to people who wish to end their misery. He even proclaimed on Sunday Times Magazine that he plans to build a chain of death center, much like Starbucks with a store around every street corner.

Minelli believes that if some people wish to end their lives, for whatever reason, then it is their choice. He also believes that instead of stopping them, or condemning them, society should provide them with information on how to effectively end their sufferings. So instead of leaving people in misery, or ending their lives in a horrible ways, Minelli and his organization try to help people achieve their death wish in the most comfortable way.

The whole organization is founded on the belief that if a person no longer wishes to live, then there must be a significant reason behind their decision. Suicide is their decision and a way to embrace death by choice.

Dignitas is also reported to admit that they actually help end the lives of people who are not terminally ill. Minelli commits to never say no to a person who asks to end their life. With these claims, Dignitas and Minelli might face questioning but they remain firmly believe that they only try to provide relief people of their sufferings. With his philosophy, Minelli represents an odd, but strongly recognized idea within the for-euthanasia cause. His beliefs resonate with a lot of other supporters in the claim that each person should have the right to decide his or her own fate, be it death or life. This, claimed by Minelli, is one of the most fundamental human rights.

Although his method is questioned by many people, Minelli’s believes is not quite unique. In fact, among the supporters of euthanasia, the argument for individuality is the strongest, believing that if a person should have the right to his or her own body. This apparently resonates with the suicidal group, even though this group doesn’t necessarily have terminal illness.

Euthanasia Organization pt2

The argument against euthanasia focuses on society as a whole. They argue that by allowing this practice, the entire social norms and regulations will be turned upside down and creating chaos. There will be loopholes which people can take advantage of to abuse or misuse this concept for their benefits, of just for their whim.

Minelli’s belief and the pro-euthanasia movement instead focus on the rights of individual. To them, what is most important is to ensure the rights and the happiness of individuals before arguing about the abstract concept of society. A person has the right to decide his or her own life and death, and if the life they are living is too miserable, it is more humane to end it rather than prolong the suffering.